Regarding the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act (S. 1843), which the House passed last year and upon which the Senate is set to vote today, I had to ask yesterday what reasonable person could possibly oppose it. The New York Times was kind enough to give me an answer today:
Wait for it...

Wait for it...
Senate Republicans, of course! The esteemed Senator from Kentucky, Mitch McConnell is on record with the Times as saying "We think that this bill is primarily designed to create a massive amount of new litigation in our country." He is not on record as complaining about uppity women trying to screw the white menz out of their rightful place in the hierarchy and take away their jobs and emasculate them with pixie sticks, but that's probably not far off.
Meanwhile, the right-on Senator from Maine, Olympia Snowe, a co-sponsor of the bill, resorted to very strong language against the Republicans who wish to deny the bill the floor: "unfortunate," she said. McConnell had better be careful, from Ms. Snowe that's tantamount to pulling out the pixie stick.
Majority Leader Reid has delayed the Senate's convening today until 5:00 PM so that all of the presidential campaigners can be on hand for this critical vote. Maverick McCain is not expected to attend. He's too busy with his It's Hip to Be Poor Tour of the Downtrodden to be bothered with actually doing anything to, you know, help them or crazy stuff like that.
If you believe, as I do, that the ability to do the same job as well as or better than one's counterparts merits a salary at the very least commensurate with theirs, then get on the horn and call your Congress Critter (by phone at 866-338-1015 or email) - 'specially if he's a weasel who runs at the sight of pixie sticks. Wankers.
UPDATED, From WaPo, the Senators aren't the only ones askeered of letting the great unwashed have their day(s) in court, our wonderful Weasel-in-Chief has threatened to veto the bill should it somehow make it out of the Senate. To put this in perspective, it's not just a women's issue. The original court decision has already had an impact on other kinds of discrimination suits:
the bill is a needed remedy for a ruling that is already having far-reaching and unexpected effects, limiting access to the courts by female athletes seeking to compete in a male-dominated sport, disabled people seeking to enforce fair housing laws and workers pressing claims of age discrimination, as well as women who are paid less than their male co-workers, according to a survey of federal court cases.
So now it's not just the uppity women who need to be quashed, but also the disabled and the old. Of course, the disabled have always been a thorn in our national sides, demanding ridiculous things like wheelchair access or braille in elevators. And don't get me started on people over 25 - completely useless, senile quacks, all of 'em.
"The impact of this decision was enormous," said Nan Aron, president of the Alliance for Justice, a national association of civil rights, women's and consumer organizations, which conducted the survey. "It's not just American workers who are affected, but those seeking redress to remedy all kinds of discriminatory actions."
Say it with me, class: Wankers.
UPDATE 2: Shame on you, Johnny Isakson (R-GA) for suggesting this bill will unfairly "allow people to file discrimination suits against employers for deeds decades old." (AP) The bill will do no such thing - unless that discrimination is still ongoing, decades later, and at least one instance occured within the last six months. Your obfuscation borders on a lie, sir, and shoves a knife in the back of every working person who ever voted for you.
Saxby Chambliss, the other R-GA - not to be confused, however temptingly, with Zaxby's the Chicken Place (Zaxby's at least peddles something tasty, unlike the Senator who got himself elected by calling Max Cleland a coward) - also voted against.
Weasels.
UPDATE 3: It's over for today. 42 Senators voted to block the debate. 57 voted in favor of debate, falling short of the magic number 60.
For more on this, see Happy Equal Pay Day.






