Take a comment, leave a comment
Kiosan likes comments. Login below.
Login
User name:
Password:
Remember me 
Search
Blogroll Me!

This Month
December 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31
Year Archive
Main Page  »  Media
View Article  Prager Still Prattling
Dennis Prager, in what is an apparent attempt to climb out of the bigoted little foxhole he dug for himself last week, now suggests Representative-elect Keith Ellison (D-MN) should be permitted to swear his oath of office on the holy book of his faith, the Qu'ran, but only if he puts a Christian Bible on top.  Prager suggests this "compromise" would satisfy both him and "the vast majority of Americans."

Correct me if I'm wrong here, but "vast majority of Americans" don't appear to be experiencing mega-wedgies over this the way Prager is.  The vast majority of Americans, even the vast majority of conservative pundits, have, in fact, disowned Prager's ranting as nonsense, bigotry, or both.

This latest ridiculousness comes on the heels of calls for Prager's removal from the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council, a position to which the president appointed him in August, and which is meant to educate people on the history and dangers of racial hatreds and "encourage visitors to reflect upon the moral and spiritual questions raised by the events of the Holocaust" (US Holocaust Memorial Museum).

Now, despite last week's insistence that swearing on the Qu'ran (or anything other than the Bible) was the equivalent of swearing on Mein Kampf, Prager attempts to rewrite history with the following:

The issue has never been one of religious freedom or attitudes toward Islam," [said] Prager, who is Jewish. "The issue has been from the outset honoring the most important text of American history.

The issue absolutely was one of religious freedom.  Relative to the Congressional Oath of Office, Article VI, Clause 3 of the Constitution states:

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.

A modern religious test would include forcing an elected official to swear on any religious text at all, but particularly requiring him or her to swear upon the text of some fallacious national or supposed historical State religion.

As to the status of "the most important text in American history," One could easily say the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution was the most important text in American history.  One could even make a case for the Gettysburg Address, the Emancipation Proclamation, or the Magna Carta, but the Bible - regardless of what those on the far right would like to think - is not the most important text of our nation's history.  To say that it is, is a slap in the face to every non-Christian who ever died protecting Mr. Prager's right to spit upon their graves.

But I guess that's fine with Prager, so long as he's not the target.  Thieves only care about property rights, after all, when the property being stolen is their own.



See also: Wasn't this Discussed in High School Civics?
View Article  NetRatings Finds High Concentration of Republicans on Rush Limbaugh's Website
The NY Times blurbed this morning regarding some recent NetRatings findings:  Rush Limbaugh's website enjoys a higher concentration of Republicans than any other (measured) site on the web, followed by The Weekly Standard and NewsMax.  The website for Black Entertainment Television (BET) serves as his corollary on the left, with a higher concentration of Democrats, followed by BlackAmericaWeb and BlackPlanet.

The Web sites that are the most heavily composed of Democrats are not focused on politics, but on communities that are heavily Democratic,” said Kenneth Cassar, the chief analyst for NetRatings. “I don’t know whether that tells us that Democrats haven’t figured out how to make politics entertaining.

I don't think politics as entertainment is the issue, really, so much as Lefties on the Web don't tend to "carry water" (as Rush recently confessed he did) for anyone.  Progressives will take pot shots at centrists, whom they perceive as lacking fortitude - vacillatory and ideologically weak, while centrists will decry progressives as fantasists or hippies.  Conservative Democrats are left on the outs with both other branches, hanging, as they often do, on the social fringes of the party, with the other guests discreetly pointing and chin-jerking and wondering why those folks even want in the door, let alone up on the dais with the big names.

Even within the progressive community, recent days have highlighted a schism regarding language: when or whether to use certain words, the price we pay for indulging in them, and whether it is worth risking the entire production for the satisfaction of garnering the highest ticket price on the block.

So, while echo chambers certainly exist on both ends of the political spectrum, left-leaning chambers split their audience among varying factions in a way Republicans have not experienced in the last dozen years.

Additionally, sites like Limbaugh and NewsMax offer very little (being charitable with that) to anyone who does not espouse their particular world view.  They chase off anyone not religiously married to their dogma, skewing the reading demographic toward their own party.  Of course Rush's readership is vastly more Republican - frankly, I'm shocked anyone not identifying as Republican reads his schtick.  I'd be interested to see the political affiliation claimed by the 21.5% of his visitors who say they aren't Republicans.

I'd also wonder what he said during the survey period that may have caused non-Republicans to go looking for transcripts, but maybe that's just me.

There are dozens, if not hundreds, of entertaining sites focusing on left-leaning politics.  What none of them do, however, is march lock step to a piper's tune the way Limbaugh and the Standard and NewsMax do.  We pipe our own music, hoping to attract something more substantial than our own echoes.

And while I cannot speak for every lefty blogger out there, no one I know has ever stooped to water carrier for anyone.  We may not have had much during the last twelve years, but we did have our ethics.
Email Me:
kiosan AT avoceblog DOT com



Bloggrrrlz Gallery

Feed Readers

Blog Stuff

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 2.5 License. -->

Add to Technorati Favorites

Globe of Blogs
Blog Flux Directory
Politics Blogs - Blog Top Sites





eXTReMe Tracker