Correct me if I'm wrong here, but "vast majority of Americans" don't appear to be experiencing mega-wedgies over this the way Prager is. The vast majority of Americans, even the vast majority of conservative pundits, have, in fact, disowned Prager's ranting as nonsense, bigotry, or both.
This latest ridiculousness comes on the heels of calls for Prager's removal from the U.S. Holocaust Memorial Council, a position to which the president appointed him in August, and which is meant to educate people on the history and dangers of racial hatreds and "encourage visitors to reflect upon the moral and spiritual questions raised by the events of the Holocaust" (US Holocaust Memorial Museum).
Now, despite last week's insistence that swearing on the Qu'ran (or anything other than the Bible) was the equivalent of swearing on Mein Kampf, Prager attempts to rewrite history with the following:
The issue has never been one of religious freedom or attitudes toward
Islam," [said] Prager, who is Jewish. "The issue has been from the
outset honoring the most important text of American history.
The issue absolutely was one of religious freedom. Relative to the Congressional Oath of Office, Article VI, Clause 3 of the Constitution states:The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
As to the status of "the most important text in American history," One could easily say the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution was the most important text in American history. One could even make a case for the Gettysburg Address, the Emancipation Proclamation, or the Magna Carta, but the Bible - regardless of what those on the far right would like to think - is not the most important text of our nation's history. To say that it is, is a slap in the face to every non-Christian who ever died protecting Mr. Prager's right to spit upon their graves.
But I guess that's fine with Prager, so long as he's not the target. Thieves only care about property rights, after all, when the property being stolen is their own.
See also: Wasn't this Discussed in High School Civics?






